Avior Aqua

Stadium turf water treatment at Wankhede Stadium: a nanobubble pilot

A 33-day pilot treating turf irrigation water with a NanOxy, with before-and-after water tests and the limits of the data.

Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai, before the pilot: wide view of the outfield and stands

Summary

Wankhede Stadium needed better water for turf maintenance. From 8 May to 10 June 2025 a NanOxy treated the irrigation water supplied to the ground.

TDS fell from 750 to 550 mg/L, pH moved from 6.09 to 7.50, turbidity fell from 5 to 3 NTU, hardness from 150 to 130 mg/L and ammonia from 1.5 to below 0.5 mg/L.

The water was for turf irrigation, not drinking.

Client
Mumbai Cricket Association
Location
Churchgate, Mumbai
Pilot
8 May to 10 June 2025 (33 days)
Equipment
NanOxy oxygen nanobubble generator
Water
Tanker-supplied water used to irrigate the turf
Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai, before the pilot: wide view of the outfield and stands
Before Wankhede Stadium before the pilot.
Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai, after the pilot: the ground under floodlights during an evening match
After Wankhede Stadium after the pilot.

Method

A NanOxy oxygen nanobubble generator treated the tanker-supplied water used to irrigate the turf. The pilot ran from 8 May to 10 June 2025, a period of 33 days.

The water was tested before treatment on 8 May 2025 and after on 10 June 2025. The parameters reported are TDS, pH, turbidity, hardness as CaCO₃, ammonia and reactive silica, which was below 5 mg/L in both samples. A separate sample taken on 5 May 2025 recorded conductivity.

Observations on the turf itself came from the ground team and were not measured.

Data

Wankhede Stadium irrigation water: before and after the 33-day pilot
ParameterBefore (8 May 2025)After (10 Jun 2025)
TDS (mg/L)750550
pH6.097.5
Turbidity (NTU)53
Hardness as CaCO₃ (mg/L)150130
Ammonia (mg/L)1.5<0.5
Reactive silica (mg/L)<5<5

A 5 May 2025 sample also recorded conductivity of 1,153.8 µmhos/cm.

What the ground team reported

The grounds team reported greener turf in patchy zones, better moisture retention on the central pitch, less dew during evening matches and quicker patch recovery. These are their observations, not measurements. No turf, soil or irrigation-volume data was recorded.

Limitations

  • One stadium, one 33-day window, no control plot.
  • The data are a before sample and an after sample. Variation in the tanker supply between the two dates cannot be separated from the effect of treatment.
  • Irrigation volume was not measured, so there is no water-saving figure.
  • Turf observations are qualitative and come from the ground team.

Want similar data for your site?

We start with an assessment, agree what to measure, then run a pilot.

Request a site assessment